> Unlike traditional hybrid frameworks with predefined APIs or plugin systems, enClose removes restrictions, giving developers complete freedom to build any app they envision.
> Unlike Cordova, which can be limiting and complex, enClose offers a refreshing alternative. It doesn't confine you to a predefined set of functions via an API; instead, it enables you to tap into the full potential of the iOS and MacOS platforms.
The fact that a GitHub repo's readme is full of vague terms, zero examples, use cases and technical details just feels awfully distressing to me.
It's a marketing pitch, sure there's no harm in it but feels like the wrong place for it.
How does enClose handle performance optimization and memory management when bridging between native Swift code and JavaScript in high-frequency interaction scenarios?
> Unlike traditional hybrid frameworks with predefined APIs or plugin systems, enClose removes restrictions, giving developers complete freedom to build any app they envision.
> Unlike Cordova, which can be limiting and complex, enClose offers a refreshing alternative. It doesn't confine you to a predefined set of functions via an API; instead, it enables you to tap into the full potential of the iOS and MacOS platforms.
The fact that a GitHub repo's readme is full of vague terms, zero examples, use cases and technical details just feels awfully distressing to me. It's a marketing pitch, sure there's no harm in it but feels like the wrong place for it.
How does enClose handle performance optimization and memory management when bridging between native Swift code and JavaScript in high-frequency interaction scenarios?