I have no trust in New York Times journalists, who are world renowned war mongers and CIA puppets, but they are probably right. China is a socialist democracy, whilst Russia is a brutal Bourgeois dictatorship, like in the rest of the western world. Those two countries have little ideological similarities and the Washington regime has every interest Putin joining its ranks against socialism.
What in the world have you been smoking? One single political party has run the country with no major dissent allowed since 1949 and you consider this a socialist democracy? Hint: it's not very democratic if your voting ballots only allow candidates from one legally permitted party.
>Russia is a brutal Bourgeois dictatorship
"Bourgeois"? Care to define that a bit. Did you cut off all your reading about contrived social labels with books from the early 20th century?
Does anyone know where I can find a copy of the leaked document mentioned in this story?
I have no trust in New York Times journalists, who are world renowned war mongers and CIA puppets, but they are probably right. China is a socialist democracy, whilst Russia is a brutal Bourgeois dictatorship, like in the rest of the western world. Those two countries have little ideological similarities and the Washington regime has every interest Putin joining its ranks against socialism.
>China is a socialist democracy
What in the world have you been smoking? One single political party has run the country with no major dissent allowed since 1949 and you consider this a socialist democracy? Hint: it's not very democratic if your voting ballots only allow candidates from one legally permitted party.
>Russia is a brutal Bourgeois dictatorship
"Bourgeois"? Care to define that a bit. Did you cut off all your reading about contrived social labels with books from the early 20th century?
I’ve seen a number of users on HN lately using what seems to be random terms to describe groups. I do not know what to make of it.