> It should be surprising to absolutely nobody the Linux audio stack is often the subject of varying levels of negative feedback...
This is the most compelling lead-in to any technical article I've ever read. In the age of AI regurgitations, it's a joy to come across writing of such humanity. I've bookmarked this and can't wait to get back to it!
A broken audio implementation can literally injure someone (hearing damage). I think it should qualify as a safety-critical system and be treated as such.
He explicitly states that examples are not the point of the post by I wonder the specifics of this interaction.
"Even the trigger for this post is an issue from an extremely belligerent user (who I do sympathise with), who was quickly supplanted by someone else who has been extremely courteous in the face of what is definitely a frustrating experience."
> It should be surprising to absolutely nobody the Linux audio stack is often the subject of varying levels of negative feedback...
This is the most compelling lead-in to any technical article I've ever read. In the age of AI regurgitations, it's a joy to come across writing of such humanity. I've bookmarked this and can't wait to get back to it!
A broken audio implementation can literally injure someone (hearing damage). I think it should qualify as a safety-critical system and be treated as such.
He explicitly states that examples are not the point of the post by I wonder the specifics of this interaction.
"Even the trigger for this post is an issue from an extremely belligerent user (who I do sympathise with), who was quickly supplanted by someone else who has been extremely courteous in the face of what is definitely a frustrating experience."