On the occasion that I look at Youtube via an incognito window, I'm blown away by how bad the default YouTube experience has gotten - AI slop and rage-bait rule the day.
I am somewhat concerned about false positives. For example I know of one channel that creates audiobooks of old books. I am about 95% certain he's a real person reading the books, he sometimes stutters, doesn't do the characteristic fumbling of homographs, his output is consistent with a human reader (a chapter a day), and I occasionally hear him turning pages. However he does use AI generated illustrations for each video, so it could be an easy false positive..
(It would be nice if he did LibreVox because he's got a great voice for audiobooks, but some of the books he reads are still in copyright, even though the authors are long dead...)
On one side there's the 100% human created content (script, voice & image) and on the other the 100% full AI slop. But the interesting use of AI is between these extremes.
Maybe someone uses ChatGPT to help writing the script, or adds some nice visuals that help the video (taste is a thing).
Or like one of my favorite channels that I recommend to anyone that wants to know how computing works on a lower level:
This guy is from Ecuador and uses an AI voice (from 11Labs) on its videos and I didn't thought too much about it until he asked on a video if people would like him to use his own voice. And reading the comments his viewers (me included) didn't care too much about the voice and even some of them liked it (it's clear and soothing).
In this case AI makes the content better 100%.
PS: He also does all animations on Powerpoint, that blew my mind.
Hmm I don't know. I think AI art (images and video) is fun to create and look at. I think they should simply have a separate section for it.
I guess it depends on the definition of "mass produced" though. I like carefully crafted AI art. You might have to go through dozens of iterations to get a concept that you're after and maybe even do some post processing...but yeah I guess we need to search for the definition of "slop."
The non-music part of YouTube is pretty obviously a combination of education + parasocial stuff. That's the product they want to present. The autogenerated stuff hurt the quality.
I block all channels which show me AI videos. I haven’t seen one in months so I guess I blocked them all
On the occasion that I look at Youtube via an incognito window, I'm blown away by how bad the default YouTube experience has gotten - AI slop and rage-bait rule the day.
I try but it feels like whack-a-mole to me.
Good.
People like @roelvandepaar (2 million videos) should have been shut down years ago.
The problem isnt AI; the problem is quality.
Fake trailers should be banned as well.
Better late than never, I hope they succeed.
I am somewhat concerned about false positives. For example I know of one channel that creates audiobooks of old books. I am about 95% certain he's a real person reading the books, he sometimes stutters, doesn't do the characteristic fumbling of homographs, his output is consistent with a human reader (a chapter a day), and I occasionally hear him turning pages. However he does use AI generated illustrations for each video, so it could be an easy false positive..
(It would be nice if he did LibreVox because he's got a great voice for audiobooks, but some of the books he reads are still in copyright, even though the authors are long dead...)
As with everything there are levels of grey here.
On one side there's the 100% human created content (script, voice & image) and on the other the 100% full AI slop. But the interesting use of AI is between these extremes.
Maybe someone uses ChatGPT to help writing the script, or adds some nice visuals that help the video (taste is a thing).
Or like one of my favorite channels that I recommend to anyone that wants to know how computing works on a lower level:
https://www.youtube.com/@CoreDumpped
This guy is from Ecuador and uses an AI voice (from 11Labs) on its videos and I didn't thought too much about it until he asked on a video if people would like him to use his own voice. And reading the comments his viewers (me included) didn't care too much about the voice and even some of them liked it (it's clear and soothing).
In this case AI makes the content better 100%.
PS: He also does all animations on Powerpoint, that blew my mind.
Roel Van De Paar is the king of automates slop, 2 Millions videos of expert_sexchange questions.
Hmm I don't know. I think AI art (images and video) is fun to create and look at. I think they should simply have a separate section for it.
I guess it depends on the definition of "mass produced" though. I like carefully crafted AI art. You might have to go through dozens of iterations to get a concept that you're after and maybe even do some post processing...but yeah I guess we need to search for the definition of "slop."
Unless it’s an advertiser, in which case: Slop away!… until the checks start to bounce.
The non-music part of YouTube is pretty obviously a combination of education + parasocial stuff. That's the product they want to present. The autogenerated stuff hurt the quality.
Why limit it to AI slop, there's plenty of real slop as well (having to do with YT Shorts mostly).
Shame, I really enjoy HFY AI slop.