What if love, grief, and gratitude were not just feelings, but structures?
We’ve been exploring a peer-to-peer protocol where contributions—acts of support, intention, and trust—are mathematically recorded and harmonized. The result is a system where emotion is not discarded, but translated into logic: a model where “emotion drives the algorithm.”
In this model, we define an integration function:
H(f, g, z; ε, β) = ε ⋅ β ⋅ ∛(f ⋅ g) (if z > 0)
Here, ε is a prayer (intention), and β is a systemic response (gratitude).
Over time, H converges to π—a symbol of natural harmony.
We’re curious—do you think a logic-encoded emotional economy is viable? Or even desirable?
What if love, grief, and gratitude were not just feelings, but structures?
We’ve been exploring a peer-to-peer protocol where contributions—acts of support, intention, and trust—are mathematically recorded and harmonized. The result is a system where emotion is not discarded, but translated into logic: a model where “emotion drives the algorithm.”
In this model, we define an integration function: H(f, g, z; ε, β) = ε ⋅ β ⋅ ∛(f ⋅ g) (if z > 0) Here, ε is a prayer (intention), and β is a systemic response (gratitude).
Over time, H converges to π—a symbol of natural harmony.
We’re curious—do you think a logic-encoded emotional economy is viable? Or even desirable?
The full model is available here↓ https://github.com/contribution-protocol/contribution-protoc...