The fact that the government refuses to sell these, and insists instead on destroying them, demonstrates that these self-identified "fiscal conservatives" are, and always were, lying through their teeth.
Even selling them at a loss would save more money than destroying them entirely, especially when there are indeed organizations willing to cover the costs to take them off the US government's hands:
> An organization called MSI Reproductive Choices said it and other funding partners had offered to pay for the shipping and repackaging of the USAID-branded supplies, but that the US government turned down the offer.
The fact that the government refuses to sell these, and insists instead on destroying them, demonstrates that these self-identified "fiscal conservatives" are, and always were, lying through their teeth.
> The fact that the government refuses to sell these, and insists instead on destroying them,
Who, do you think, will buy contraceptives at government prices ?
Even selling them at a loss would save more money than destroying them entirely, especially when there are indeed organizations willing to cover the costs to take them off the US government's hands:
> An organization called MSI Reproductive Choices said it and other funding partners had offered to pay for the shipping and repackaging of the USAID-branded supplies, but that the US government turned down the offer.
I think in a sane world we would at least distribute them to hospitals and family planning clinics in the states for low income households.