"You should set your hostname to be your FQDN, uppercased."
Never had an issue with this.
"name: initialize Kerberos ticket"
What's the use case for this Ansible task. Never had a need to manually generate tickets.
edit: didn't read it through; this is part of their automation pipeline
--
We manage 1000+ Windows Servers with Ansible and it's been as simple as Linux SSH. Multiple SOCKS5 proxies to different AD forests, WinRM double hop works great when become:true, GPO works just fine on Linux, initial setup is very simple with realmd. Biggest manual task is setting up the service accounts for Ansible.
That's the realm side which should be upper case. The comment reference was for hostname themselves which I've always just done as lower case and have never seen a reason to make it upper case. The krb5.conf has a [domain_realm] section which can map a DNS name/suffix to the actual realm
Now do this in containers with gMSAs. It eliminates the need of passing around Admin creds. Which I cannot stress enough. You shouldn’t be throwing your DA credentials into your random Linux machine’s Kerberos cache.
Amazon open sourced a project trying to solve similar problems.
The problem I have with using a gMSA outside of Windows is you need a Kerberos principal and credential for that principal in the first place to allow retrieving the gMSA details. Why not just use that principal and avoid adding this next step.
It would be great if Linux had a mechanism where the host itself could act as the principal to retrieve the gMSA like on Windows but the GSSAPI worker model just works differently there and runs in process. A similar problem exists for using Kerberos FAST/armouring where Windows uses the hosts' ticket to wrap the client request but on Linux there is no privileged worker process that protects this ticket so the client needs to have full access to it.
The closest thing I've seen is gssproxy [1] which tries to solve the problem where you want to protect host secrets from a client actually seeing the secrets but can still use them but I've not seen anything from there to support gMSAs for armouring for client TGT requests.
"You should set your hostname to be your FQDN, uppercased."
Never had an issue with this.
"name: initialize Kerberos ticket"
What's the use case for this Ansible task. Never had a need to manually generate tickets.
edit: didn't read it through; this is part of their automation pipeline
--
We manage 1000+ Windows Servers with Ansible and it's been as simple as Linux SSH. Multiple SOCKS5 proxies to different AD forests, WinRM double hop works great when become:true, GPO works just fine on Linux, initial setup is very simple with realmd. Biggest manual task is setting up the service accounts for Ansible.
It’s not required, but it is a long standing convention with the justification that it makes for easier troubleshooting.
https://web.mit.edu/kerberos/www/krb5-latest/doc/admin/realm...
That's the realm side which should be upper case. The comment reference was for hostname themselves which I've always just done as lower case and have never seen a reason to make it upper case. The krb5.conf has a [domain_realm] section which can map a DNS name/suffix to the actual realm
iirc, on the windows side, workgroups had to be upper case, so initially the krb realm was set to the workgroup name. dns came later
Now do this in containers with gMSAs. It eliminates the need of passing around Admin creds. Which I cannot stress enough. You shouldn’t be throwing your DA credentials into your random Linux machine’s Kerberos cache.
Amazon open sourced a project trying to solve similar problems.
https://github.com/aws/credentials-fetcher
Nifty, but was clearly made with AWS assumptions and we had to roll our own with the various hooks we needed for our cloud infra.
The problem I have with using a gMSA outside of Windows is you need a Kerberos principal and credential for that principal in the first place to allow retrieving the gMSA details. Why not just use that principal and avoid adding this next step.
It would be great if Linux had a mechanism where the host itself could act as the principal to retrieve the gMSA like on Windows but the GSSAPI worker model just works differently there and runs in process. A similar problem exists for using Kerberos FAST/armouring where Windows uses the hosts' ticket to wrap the client request but on Linux there is no privileged worker process that protects this ticket so the client needs to have full access to it.
The closest thing I've seen is gssproxy [1] which tries to solve the problem where you want to protect host secrets from a client actually seeing the secrets but can still use them but I've not seen anything from there to support gMSAs for armouring for client TGT requests.
[1] https://github.com/gssapi/gssproxy
I went through a similar journey recently for the local development environment of my team.
I couldn't figure out yet, whether there is a reasonable and safe way to authenticate at an AD inside a GitHub Action. Anyone done that?