If it's not, well, it's interesting that they feel the vibe strong enough in their disfavor to come to the conclusion that they need this kind of event. I guess it's an indication that this vibe is stronger than commonly admitted.
Everyone should flood the march with opposition signs that argue for a 100% wealth tax on billionaires. Many of them who are corruptly enriching themselves right now should be in jail.
I think 100% wealth tax for billionaires is too kind, they are definitely experts in hiding their money. I would suppose 101-110% for them which makes things much more fair then letting them to have those funds which they have stolen earlier, before setting the 100% tax. And wait a minute, there will be no any single islang on Earth having less than 100% wealth tax.
Confirmed by Mission Local: https://x.com/jrivanob/status/2018139137300373609
Anyone else getting Gavin Belson interview vibes from this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5zQpN28xa4
And also the actual CNN interview that the parody was based on:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PN-vUaawaF8
It must be some kind of a joke.
If it's not, well, it's interesting that they feel the vibe strong enough in their disfavor to come to the conclusion that they need this kind of event. I guess it's an indication that this vibe is stronger than commonly admitted.
What kind of logic is this? Apply this to any other march for something and you’ll see that this makes no sense at all.
Putting Jeff Bezos at the top of this list is bold. They should put a number next to each name for how many times they appear in the Epstein files.
Because ever having met Epstein invalidates all your success and everything you have built?
I'll go if no one else will - will be great for networking!
Everyone should flood the march with opposition signs that argue for a 100% wealth tax on billionaires. Many of them who are corruptly enriching themselves right now should be in jail.
I think 100% wealth tax for billionaires is too kind, they are definitely experts in hiding their money. I would suppose 101-110% for them which makes things much more fair then letting them to have those funds which they have stolen earlier, before setting the 100% tax. And wait a minute, there will be no any single islang on Earth having less than 100% wealth tax.
Have I continued your logics correctly?
I just wonder how good their running shoes are.