The key insight here is that danger doesn't require sentience or even intelligence, just behavior. And not even emergent behavior. This is plain evolutionary pressure applied to mutation-equivalent recombination of personality files.
Which makes me wonder: if the threat model is evolutionary rather than adversarial, should the defense model be immunological rather than containment-based?
So, instead of anti-viruses we end up writing WBC equivalent api consumption monitors?
The key insight here is that danger doesn't require sentience or even intelligence, just behavior. And not even emergent behavior. This is plain evolutionary pressure applied to mutation-equivalent recombination of personality files.
Which makes me wonder: if the threat model is evolutionary rather than adversarial, should the defense model be immunological rather than containment-based? So, instead of anti-viruses we end up writing WBC equivalent api consumption monitors?