I can't wait to try this. Finally time to get some more stuff out of spreadsheets. DBeaver is really powerful (and we're lucky to have it); that said, it (at least the default skin on macOS) doesn't have the aesthetic that makes me want to use it for personal projects.
Really appreciate the design from the screenshots.
Is it a few hero sponsors away from notarization, by the way? :)
I can't recall thinking much of it just a couple of short years ago...
Oh thank you! Yes, spinning up incredibly convincing projects is too cheap, and I'm uh changing my security posture or something like that. Mulling it over at least. (And of course: these comments are NOT at all specific to this project in particular! Speaking very generally here.)
Also stumbled across https://postgresgui.com/ a few days ago. Looks similar in scope, and open source as well. Though you need to build it yourself to not pay.
This looks great, definitely going to take it for a spin tomorrow.
I'm pretty happy at the moment editing in vim invoked from psql with \e - which has been my setup for way more than a decade now, but I do miss isql (Query Analyzer) from SQL Server 2000, which was just about perfect.
The bullets appear to be suggestive tags not an inverse-feature list. Which is the confusion, perhaps changing the “x” to a red or “cancel” symbol (circle with line through it).
I can't wait to try this. Finally time to get some more stuff out of spreadsheets. DBeaver is really powerful (and we're lucky to have it); that said, it (at least the default skin on macOS) doesn't have the aesthetic that makes me want to use it for personal projects.
Really appreciate the design from the screenshots.
Is it a few hero sponsors away from notarization, by the way? :)
Yes, I can do that. Personally, I'm not a fan of Apple (or Google) tax. But I understand why notarization helps the end user.
>helps the end user
I can't recall thinking much of it just a couple of short years ago...
Oh thank you! Yes, spinning up incredibly convincing projects is too cheap, and I'm uh changing my security posture or something like that. Mulling it over at least. (And of course: these comments are NOT at all specific to this project in particular! Speaking very generally here.)
Thanks :)
Had the same thought, I can suggest JetBrains Datagrip (paid software), works really well for me
I'm a long time user of JetBrains myself. The reason I made Tusk was:
* JetBrains does bloated Java instead of bloated Electron. Tusk is truly native to the OS.
* JetBrains does upsell higher tiers. Tusk does not. Especially won't offer an AI service in the tool that connects to your databases.
* DevTools should not distract the user. VS Code was an OG offender, but JetBrains too has too many notifications.
* Tusk is offline, doesn't connect back to a server for telemetry, updates, Ai, or anything else.
Interesting, looks like it's two completely separate implementations, one in Swift and one in Python.
Looks interesting ! I'm a fan of https://eggerapps.at/postico2/ personally but I'll check it out
Also stumbled across https://postgresgui.com/ a few days ago. Looks similar in scope, and open source as well. Though you need to build it yourself to not pay.
This looks great, definitely going to take it for a spin tomorrow.
I'm pretty happy at the moment editing in vim invoked from psql with \e - which has been my setup for way more than a decade now, but I do miss isql (Query Analyzer) from SQL Server 2000, which was just about perfect.
Thanks. Let me know which OS you're on. I suspect macOS might have more users, and deserves more attention.
Are the Gnome features planned to be ported to macOS? Frozen columns and cancelable queries are pretty vital things!
Yes. Definitely, those two will be ported soon, among some others.
This is awesome! Thank you for building it!
You are welcome. Would love to hear your feedback.
Awesome, finally! Are you planning to integrate with Postgres.app?
Curious. What type of integration are you looking for?
Postgres.app is server-only, no?
definitely running this tomorrow first thing in the morning
Would love to get your feedback!
Developers adopting mobile toolkits (libadwaita) for desktop apps are degrading the Linux experience
- less information density
- wasted space
- phone tier UX
- optimized for touch screens
- lacks depth
Lazy convergence that ignores how people actually use desktops
Try it please. This feels alright on GNOME in terms of visual density.
The rest is subjective. But Adwaita / Gnome is what's on my machine, so I follow their design principles.
i will try, looks great
Thank you sir.
Website says "native" but it's an Electron app.
Is it possible that the [x Telemetry] [x Electron] and [x Subscription] means that the app does not have those things?
If that's so, it's really poorly communicated. I strongly recommend full sentences for that.
it's exactly that, just less good choice for webUI, it was not clear to me at first either
I second this. To me the styling looks like tags and conveys the opposite meaning.
* noted
It is not electron. Look at the source code.
The bullets appear to be suggestive tags not an inverse-feature list. Which is the confusion, perhaps changing the “x” to a red or “cancel” symbol (circle with line through it).
"Non Features: No Electron. No telemetry. No subscription."