No. It would likely hallucinate answers to questions the author meant to leave unanswered, or never considered. It can’t be considered canon, so I don’t know that it would be any better than me assuming the answer based on context.
In other cases, it might encourage books that are less complete, where the author leans on the AI to drive usage and engagement for increased profit, which would make the book itself worse.
It's possible there would be a market for this in genres where there is a strong parasocial connection to the author that drives a desire to simulate interaction.
For something factual or scientific/mathematical, I would not want to interact with a nondeterministic pretend version of the author.
Well done for doing some market research before rushing off to code. This is far more sensible than coding first and wondering later.
To answer your question, no. I read a lot and frankly I've never wanted to discuss anything with an author. My relationship is with the characters in the book, not the author.
For non-fiction books there is so much information online that if I want to dig deeper I'll just Google or Chat it.
I've written two text books myself - very (very) niche books that sold in the hundreds of copies. (So very small). I've never had a reader reach out to discuss anything.
Yes, I expect there are people out there who want to correspond with authors. But I suspect a large fraction of them aren't "curious" but more want to demonstrate competence or whatever. I doubt an AI would satisfy them.
Yes, I think there is a market (however thin) for this, but reaching that market will be close to impossible. I would suggest either building this knowing you'd be the only user, or abandoning the idea.
Not necessarily.
At least, it should be labeled and set up differently. I do not care about the author (usually), but the content. I already can discuss books with AI. Nothing special here. What could be interesting is offering AI powered training sessions as an add-on to the book. However, the question would be why the book in the first place.
What about questions that are in the negative space of the book?
Like I might want to ask the author of a book why he didn't cite a book that was cited by many of the books he cited, was relevant to what he was trying to say, particularly looking back 20 years later comparing his work to other works that followed it.
No. It would likely hallucinate answers to questions the author meant to leave unanswered, or never considered. It can’t be considered canon, so I don’t know that it would be any better than me assuming the answer based on context.
In other cases, it might encourage books that are less complete, where the author leans on the AI to drive usage and engagement for increased profit, which would make the book itself worse.
No. Wouldn't try it for free.
It's possible there would be a market for this in genres where there is a strong parasocial connection to the author that drives a desire to simulate interaction.
For something factual or scientific/mathematical, I would not want to interact with a nondeterministic pretend version of the author.
Well done for doing some market research before rushing off to code. This is far more sensible than coding first and wondering later.
To answer your question, no. I read a lot and frankly I've never wanted to discuss anything with an author. My relationship is with the characters in the book, not the author.
For non-fiction books there is so much information online that if I want to dig deeper I'll just Google or Chat it.
I've written two text books myself - very (very) niche books that sold in the hundreds of copies. (So very small). I've never had a reader reach out to discuss anything.
Yes, I expect there are people out there who want to correspond with authors. But I suspect a large fraction of them aren't "curious" but more want to demonstrate competence or whatever. I doubt an AI would satisfy them.
Yes, I think there is a market (however thin) for this, but reaching that market will be close to impossible. I would suggest either building this knowing you'd be the only user, or abandoning the idea.
Not necessarily. At least, it should be labeled and set up differently. I do not care about the author (usually), but the content. I already can discuss books with AI. Nothing special here. What could be interesting is offering AI powered training sessions as an add-on to the book. However, the question would be why the book in the first place.
What about questions that are in the negative space of the book?
Like I might want to ask the author of a book why he didn't cite a book that was cited by many of the books he cited, was relevant to what he was trying to say, particularly looking back 20 years later comparing his work to other works that followed it.
The answers to that aren't in the book!
The answer is the same as for would you like to pay for a glass of alcohol free Radler (beer with gas water) - HELL NO! I EVEN WOULD NOT ORDER IT.
No.
I’d pay 15$ for a second book that had more details and explanations though.
AI still makes up stuff, not fun with books
Books= use of brain= Intelligence= Growth
AI≠ Inteligence= no growth
Purpose of books will be doomed if you use AI in them
No
I’d pay a premium not to be exposed to advertisements for this service.
I’d pay a premium for the works of authors who despise it, if it existed; I reckon this would be a signal of their quality.
Fuck no