- sometimes i really remember that image of a the evolution of man and at the last step it says we need to turn back
- some of the recent inventions genuinely feel like "oops this is a bad idea, lets go back one step"
- a non deterministic system that actively atrophies skills and people actively signing up for it left and right has to be one of the wildest things i have seen in my lifetime so far
Yeah trillions of investment into development and paying millions to researchers to say they solved a bunch of math problems and it can write mediocre code
This is a senseless comment. Worlds progress also stands behind the emissions it produces. In fact there are almost no examples of high gdp low energy use countries at all.
High energy use is exactly how prosperity happens. If anything, you should see physical infrastructure and go “yeah that’s great for economy and people”.
There is clean(er) and safer renewable energy. The human race doesn't have to pollute and climate change itself into near extinction to greedily chase prosperity at the expense of its children's future.
There’s no evidence of near extinction. You are doing a disservice by promoting conspiracy theories like this while the last 50 years pulled billions out of poverty by using more energy.
I would love to verify that the consensus is that humanity would get extinct if we don’t do anything about emissions.
- sometimes i really remember that image of a the evolution of man and at the last step it says we need to turn back
- some of the recent inventions genuinely feel like "oops this is a bad idea, lets go back one step"
- a non deterministic system that actively atrophies skills and people actively signing up for it left and right has to be one of the wildest things i have seen in my lifetime so far
Genre of hn comment where you lump criticisms that have not much together “we need to go back bro”
AI progress feels much less magical when you include the physical infrastructure and energy costs behind every model call.
Yeah trillions of investment into development and paying millions to researchers to say they solved a bunch of math problems and it can write mediocre code
It also feels much less magical when you see what people actually waste it on.
Images of hyperrealistic big booby waifus -or- A habitable planet.
Which way, western man?
You don’t consider surveillance magical!?!?
Unfortunately, this report doesn’t tell us about resource usage per model call. It only tells us the numerator and we also need the denominator.
This is a senseless comment. Worlds progress also stands behind the emissions it produces. In fact there are almost no examples of high gdp low energy use countries at all.
High energy use is exactly how prosperity happens. If anything, you should see physical infrastructure and go “yeah that’s great for economy and people”.
There is clean(er) and safer renewable energy. The human race doesn't have to pollute and climate change itself into near extinction to greedily chase prosperity at the expense of its children's future.
There’s no evidence of near extinction. You are doing a disservice by promoting conspiracy theories like this while the last 50 years pulled billions out of poverty by using more energy.
I would love to verify that the consensus is that humanity would get extinct if we don’t do anything about emissions.
Source blog post: https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2026/07/09/respons...