Depends on what you want to use it for. As a mirror for git repositories? It works fine. Never used it as a "collaboration platform for development teams" so unsure how well it'd work for that. It has rough edges, not gonna lie, but they have a starting point at least, will see how it progresses I suppose. If federation is what you're out after, it seems like the strongest bet so far. Hopefully Forgejo/Codeberg gets there soon too and is interoperable as well, same for/with Radicle ideally, so they all can be interoperable.
How do people find tangled who have tried it? I've been eyeing it. How does it compare to GitHub?
Depends on what you want to use it for. As a mirror for git repositories? It works fine. Never used it as a "collaboration platform for development teams" so unsure how well it'd work for that. It has rough edges, not gonna lie, but they have a starting point at least, will see how it progresses I suppose. If federation is what you're out after, it seems like the strongest bet so far. Hopefully Forgejo/Codeberg gets there soon too and is interoperable as well, same for/with Radicle ideally, so they all can be interoperable.
Tangled terrible name for source control.
In a space where names include git, mercurial, fossil, and jujutsu? I think it's fine.
It's fitting a theme of self-deprecation if we consider the origin of the name "git", no?
why is git's name self-deprecating? Wasn't it just chosen randomly and has no meaning?
You could surely check.. (oh boy your history)