Explaining WHY 400hz power weighs less would have been useful. The article is a one-paragraph "because" with a lot of padding.
Power doesn't come from nowhere. It's taken as some form of output from the gas turbines driving the turboprop. There are several ways this COULD be done, bearing in mind that these things rotate at 2,000 to 20,000 RPM depending on where you are between the fan and the actual turbine jet engine part. It's done as a shaft drive through a gearbox as I understand it, which implies mechanical parts, wear and cost.
I have no idea if the step down from 2k to 50hz is painful but I can see from the web 400hz is closer to the same functional RPM of the engine parts as-is so it may be this simplies the gearbox considerably: less gear stages == less loss over the gearing.
The other aspect is that the electrical parts of the power system are lighter at the higher frequency too. A 400hz transformer is meaningfully smaller and lighter than a 50hz one.
This is the same idea as switching power supplies but planes had to solve that before power semiconductors were cheap enough.
The power frequency also has an impact on the size of all the induction motors.
I guess if you were designing it from scratch today you would let the generator produce power at whatever frequency the mechanical engineers tell you they want to and the power electronics could convert it without problems. You would do the same thing the other way around on the motors.
A transformer works on A/C only, for one thing by being electromagnetically sensitive to the cyclic reversal of incoming voltage.
The higher the number of windings in the coil, and/or the amount of iron in the core, the greater the impedance to this constant polarity reversal. And the more sensitive to the lower frequencies.
These are basically audio frequencies and the inductance presented by the transformer's primary winding acts almost as a low-pass filter whose effectiveness changes rapidly as frequency approaches zero. IOW a small transformer doesn't have as much frequency response to the "lows", and that sensitivity is what is needed before it can induce current into the secondary winding to begin with. All other tings being equal, bigger iron would respond stronger to the same more-gradual fluctuations in primary voltage.
Now with the alternator as the source of the frequency, a physically smaller alternator running at higher RPM could produce as much power as a bigger one running at lower rpm.
Edit: Also when you use the 115V/400Hz A/C elsewhere on the aircraft like to power a radio, when it it rectified to DC inside the radio it takes a lot smaller capacitors and stuff to filter out the 400Hz line noise than it would for the low hum of 115V/60Hz.
The article is stupidly wrong. You don't need less generators or alternator with higher frequencies.
Instead, for each generator you have, you need less copper winding, less iron mass, making generators smallers.
Also, transformers get smaller for the same reason, and thus, lighter.
Planes dont have generators, like many systems on a plane from air to electricity they leverage the power units they already have - the big engines on the wings.
Explaining WHY 400hz power weighs less would have been useful. The article is a one-paragraph "because" with a lot of padding.
Power doesn't come from nowhere. It's taken as some form of output from the gas turbines driving the turboprop. There are several ways this COULD be done, bearing in mind that these things rotate at 2,000 to 20,000 RPM depending on where you are between the fan and the actual turbine jet engine part. It's done as a shaft drive through a gearbox as I understand it, which implies mechanical parts, wear and cost.
I have no idea if the step down from 2k to 50hz is painful but I can see from the web 400hz is closer to the same functional RPM of the engine parts as-is so it may be this simplies the gearbox considerably: less gear stages == less loss over the gearing.
The other aspect is that the electrical parts of the power system are lighter at the higher frequency too. A 400hz transformer is meaningfully smaller and lighter than a 50hz one.
This is the same idea as switching power supplies but planes had to solve that before power semiconductors were cheap enough.
The power frequency also has an impact on the size of all the induction motors.
I guess if you were designing it from scratch today you would let the generator produce power at whatever frequency the mechanical engineers tell you they want to and the power electronics could convert it without problems. You would do the same thing the other way around on the motors.
A transformer works on A/C only, for one thing by being electromagnetically sensitive to the cyclic reversal of incoming voltage.
The higher the number of windings in the coil, and/or the amount of iron in the core, the greater the impedance to this constant polarity reversal. And the more sensitive to the lower frequencies.
These are basically audio frequencies and the inductance presented by the transformer's primary winding acts almost as a low-pass filter whose effectiveness changes rapidly as frequency approaches zero. IOW a small transformer doesn't have as much frequency response to the "lows", and that sensitivity is what is needed before it can induce current into the secondary winding to begin with. All other tings being equal, bigger iron would respond stronger to the same more-gradual fluctuations in primary voltage.
Now with the alternator as the source of the frequency, a physically smaller alternator running at higher RPM could produce as much power as a bigger one running at lower rpm.
Found a couple worthwhile links:
https://www.gohz.com/why-we-use-115v-400hz-power-supply-in-a...
https://www.powerstream.com/400hz-tutorial.htm
Edit: Also when you use the 115V/400Hz A/C elsewhere on the aircraft like to power a radio, when it it rectified to DC inside the radio it takes a lot smaller capacitors and stuff to filter out the 400Hz line noise than it would for the low hum of 115V/60Hz.
The article is stupidly wrong. You don't need less generators or alternator with higher frequencies. Instead, for each generator you have, you need less copper winding, less iron mass, making generators smallers. Also, transformers get smaller for the same reason, and thus, lighter.
Planes dont have generators, like many systems on a plane from air to electricity they leverage the power units they already have - the big engines on the wings.