I can't begin to picture how much AI slop they are having to filter out. I wonder if they are going to entertain some UX to save people disappointment. "The project should be non-trivial. Don't post quickly-generated one-offs; anybody can do that now. Share something that is deeply personal and interesting to you. Explain how and why." To me the whole HN website feels like a quickly-generated one-off lol. Guess they hope you can find the freshest ruleset for the thing you're trying to post. https://news.ycombinator.com/showhn.html
If it was generated pre-2020 by some slow meatballs (like news.ycombinator.com), it is okay to have edges; post-2020, it must be closed to perfection.
I don't know what everybody is complaining about AI-generated content. In the past, nobody cared how the content was generated (ed, vim, emacs, VS Code, ...). It either was good or it was not.
Personally, I don't care if the content is AI-generated as long as it is good. But maybe that is, because I think that it is possible to generate good content using AI.
Nice, this has a cute feel to it. I smiled about some of the gossip at the bottom. Tiny suggestions: make the space bar pause/unpause, and for my ears the background music could be way quieter compared to the sound effects - with the default settings I thought the game had no sound yet.
Will definitely play more in the evening!
Thanks for the feedback! If you hold the volume button it opens up sliders to adjust the music/ambient noise levels. I should make this more obvious, probably.
No it's fine, I had no trouble finding the sound settings! My remark was just about the defaults (and probably is more of an individual preference anyway)
Not yet. There are fires, and a trained safety team (something you have to get funded and maintain) puts them out. SimTower didn't have crime either, so I didn't consider building that out.
Cute game! Very CPU-hungry (in Firefox on Linux), maybe you can get it a bit more optimized. There are some annoying AI-isms ("the X is the goal not the Y"-- just tell me the X please).
Is there a way to build anything on the ground floor, or is it just a big empty lobby? Feels like wasting a lot of space.
...The earliest strong match located by QI appeared in 1955 within a periodical called “The Commonwealth: Official Journal of the Commonwealth Club of California”. The club is a non-profit public affairs organization. The quotation [by Major George Racey Jordan] appeared as a filler item.
This smells a bit closer to "We're capitalists, but we'd like to get some lift from the current socialist vibe". If that's the case, respect for skimming off the rubes.
If not, it's giving "We're tying ourselves up with the rope the capitalists sold us".
That cuts both ways - can people in the US vote for democratic socialism, or will the capitalists then create super PACs to influence elections, thus undermining the principle of one person, one vote?
So the socialists don't influence elections? they don't have speeches and advertising? News to me -- are you sure the majority want socialism? seems like many many people don't. Or is the election only "influenced" if it doesn't go your way?
I have no horse in that race as I don't live in the US. But reading today that in Michigan the democratic primary loser outspent the winner almost 10:1 truly baffled my mind. Stuff like this isn't even legal in most other democracies, i.e. in France all presidential candidates have to have equal TV time to present their respective positions.
Imagine how the political landscape in the US would look like if people's votes were actually equal.
This PAC influence being putatively for buying advertising, to you know influence individual voters to their point of view? They can’t literally buy votes.
So votes only matter if they’re not influenced by PACs? Perhaps it’s more that if a voter agrees with a capitalist PAC then it’s no longer a valid individual vote? It smacks of anti-democratic value that the masses are too dumb to vote correctly.
Of course they don't literally buy votes, but statistically they very much do. Stuff like not having votes only on sundays, votes taking hours, publicity just meaning outspending the opponent etc. are all things most other democracies don't have. I literally had a political science course in university were these were taught as cases of voter suppression (i.e. If you are a member of the working /middle /upper class, how likely is it that you can easily be off work for a full day on a tuesday, compared to a sunday?).
Highest score is calculated by the number of days you last before everyone starves and destroys the wall built to prevent the citizens from escaping to a capitalist country.
Is it the idea to build a lot of coop working spaces first? Building homes is nice, but they don't pay as much rent.
Huh, flagged already. That seems just a bit unfair. It's a decent game! Maybe next round?
One thing I wonder about is that it does need some playtesting yet. Early game is slow!
I can't begin to picture how much AI slop they are having to filter out. I wonder if they are going to entertain some UX to save people disappointment. "The project should be non-trivial. Don't post quickly-generated one-offs; anybody can do that now. Share something that is deeply personal and interesting to you. Explain how and why." To me the whole HN website feels like a quickly-generated one-off lol. Guess they hope you can find the freshest ruleset for the thing you're trying to post. https://news.ycombinator.com/showhn.html
If it was generated pre-2020 by some slow meatballs (like news.ycombinator.com), it is okay to have edges; post-2020, it must be closed to perfection.
I don't know what everybody is complaining about AI-generated content. In the past, nobody cared how the content was generated (ed, vim, emacs, VS Code, ...). It either was good or it was not.
Personally, I don't care if the content is AI-generated as long as it is good. But maybe that is, because I think that it is possible to generate good content using AI.
Nice, this has a cute feel to it. I smiled about some of the gossip at the bottom. Tiny suggestions: make the space bar pause/unpause, and for my ears the background music could be way quieter compared to the sound effects - with the default settings I thought the game had no sound yet. Will definitely play more in the evening!
Thanks for the feedback! If you hold the volume button it opens up sliders to adjust the music/ambient noise levels. I should make this more obvious, probably.
No it's fine, I had no trouble finding the sound settings! My remark was just about the defaults (and probably is more of an individual preference anyway)
>An entire SimCity clone based on a different economy like this could be fun.
There's this example of such a game: https://store.steampowered.com/app/784150/Workers__Resources...
Hell yeah I got people to move in. Nice job getting it to walk me through those intro steps.
This is adorable and catches the original's vibe nicely, at least on first glance.
Is there crime in the game?
Not yet. There are fires, and a trained safety team (something you have to get funded and maintain) puts them out. SimTower didn't have crime either, so I didn't consider building that out.
I recall SimTower had bomb threats for the security team to deal with.
Cute game! Very CPU-hungry (in Firefox on Linux), maybe you can get it a bit more optimized. There are some annoying AI-isms ("the X is the goal not the Y"-- just tell me the X please).
Is there a way to build anything on the ground floor, or is it just a big empty lobby? Feels like wasting a lot of space.
Thanks...I will work on optimizing that. There's also a Mac version you can download, but that wouldn't work in your case.
As someone else said, the lobby is the lobby - eventually the Assembly starts to meet there once you make enough progress, but that is about it.
Got it, fair enough, thanks!
Simtower, which he modeled this after, only allowed lobby on the first floor… or a multi floored lobby.
There's an incredible irony in using the most effective tool capitalism has produced to boost the power of capital, to make a game about socialism.
But not that new, "The capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them" is a quote attributed to Lenin, so >100 years old by now
https://quoteinvestigator.com/2018/02/22/rope/
This smells a bit closer to "We're capitalists, but we'd like to get some lift from the current socialist vibe". If that's the case, respect for skimming off the rubes.
If not, it's giving "We're tying ourselves up with the rope the capitalists sold us".
Well, it's a free game, and open source...
I acknowledge the irony though.
> attracting a large grant
From whom?
> democratic socialism
Can the people democratically decide they want capitalism instead?
That cuts both ways - can people in the US vote for democratic socialism, or will the capitalists then create super PACs to influence elections, thus undermining the principle of one person, one vote?
So the socialists don't influence elections? they don't have speeches and advertising? News to me -- are you sure the majority want socialism? seems like many many people don't. Or is the election only "influenced" if it doesn't go your way?
I have no horse in that race as I don't live in the US. But reading today that in Michigan the democratic primary loser outspent the winner almost 10:1 truly baffled my mind. Stuff like this isn't even legal in most other democracies, i.e. in France all presidential candidates have to have equal TV time to present their respective positions.
Imagine how the political landscape in the US would look like if people's votes were actually equal.
So the primary should have gone to the person who spent more? maybe infinite spending can't force through an unpopular platform?
I think you've misinterpreted the parent.
Someone almost bought that election. That it didn't quite work doesn't make it a good scenario.
This is nonsensical.
This PAC influence being putatively for buying advertising, to you know influence individual voters to their point of view? They can’t literally buy votes.
So votes only matter if they’re not influenced by PACs? Perhaps it’s more that if a voter agrees with a capitalist PAC then it’s no longer a valid individual vote? It smacks of anti-democratic value that the masses are too dumb to vote correctly.
Of course they don't literally buy votes, but statistically they very much do. Stuff like not having votes only on sundays, votes taking hours, publicity just meaning outspending the opponent etc. are all things most other democracies don't have. I literally had a political science course in university were these were taught as cases of voter suppression (i.e. If you are a member of the working /middle /upper class, how likely is it that you can easily be off work for a full day on a tuesday, compared to a sunday?).
> Of course they don't literally buy votes, but statistically they very much do.
Counterpoint: Haley Stevens Brad Daigle Jon Tester Sherrod Brown Tom Steyer Hillary Clinton Michael Bloomberg (the list is long)
You need "some amount of money" to compete in elections, but the "money correlates to votes" is canard.
Most democratic socialist societies are capitalist, capitalism just remains politically subordinate rather than able to govern society unchecked.
Those would be social democracies.
No, social democracies are subservient to capital.
The whole modern democratic socialist movement as I understand it is primarily to fix exactly that issue.
[flagged]
venuzuela hamburger xDDDD
Highest score is calculated by the number of days you last before everyone starves and destroys the wall built to prevent the citizens from escaping to a capitalist country.
Yeah, co-ops don't exist in capitalist places like NYC, right?