> It struck me – not as drama, but as a very consequential rule of life.
I prefer the less dogmatic mental model of one-way and two-way doors.
Some decisions are possible to reverse (two-way door), while others are not or would be very costly to reverse (one-way door).
It is worth reflecting on whether most things we do or decide on tend to be two-way or one-way doors. My experience, but also sense of agency, lands me in the two-way door is much more common camp.
The idea of this framing is to break through analysis paralysis.
I would not dogmatically avoid one-way doors where they do show up.
> “Don’t do anything you can’t undo.”
> It struck me – not as drama, but as a very consequential rule of life.
I prefer the less dogmatic mental model of one-way and two-way doors.
Some decisions are possible to reverse (two-way door), while others are not or would be very costly to reverse (one-way door).
It is worth reflecting on whether most things we do or decide on tend to be two-way or one-way doors. My experience, but also sense of agency, lands me in the two-way door is much more common camp.
The idea of this framing is to break through analysis paralysis.
I would not dogmatically avoid one-way doors where they do show up.
[flagged]
Thanks for sharing this essay, can you share the prompt you used to generate it as well?
[dead]