Seems like high-risk and low-reward for your network security. You could host it behind the WG interface, but… still exposing the castle’s master key to a python web app.
I have found that WG client management is as simple as a couple scripts and a TSV file to match pubkeys to users.
Anyhow, cool project and I like the overall concept of respecting existing config.
A dead giveaway that I think it's AI-made (not necessarily a con) is the complexity of the UI and redundant information. Things like the green dot paired with "interface is up". It looks polished though.
Any notable differences from wg-easy?
Seems like high-risk and low-reward for your network security. You could host it behind the WG interface, but… still exposing the castle’s master key to a python web app.
I have found that WG client management is as simple as a couple scripts and a TSV file to match pubkeys to users.
Anyhow, cool project and I like the overall concept of respecting existing config.
Nice work, following along.
Looks like hand coded. Kudos for that!
A dead giveaway that I think it's AI-made (not necessarily a con) is the complexity of the UI and redundant information. Things like the green dot paired with "interface is up". It looks polished though.
Not sure how you could tell that - the entire repo is 4 commits, all within the last 4 hours.