It's going to cost at least $9,209, that RTX Pro 5000 72GB starts at. The GPU chip should be relatively high volume, at least compared to their Pro GPUs.
Related: Nvidia's RTX 5090 vanishes from online retail in the US
I'm actually kind of surprised at how little memory bandwidth it has "delivering up to 1,400 GB/s of bandwidth". That's not much more than a Mac Pro M5 Ultra will give (1.2 TB/s)
Somehow I though the nVidia cards were way out in a league of their own on that, and 84GB is a lot less than 256 (or, soon, 512).
It's going to cost at least $9,209, that RTX Pro 5000 72GB starts at. The GPU chip should be relatively high volume, at least compared to their Pro GPUs.
Related: Nvidia's RTX 5090 vanishes from online retail in the US
https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/gpus/nvidias-rtx-...
I'm actually kind of surprised at how little memory bandwidth it has "delivering up to 1,400 GB/s of bandwidth". That's not much more than a Mac Pro M5 Ultra will give (1.2 TB/s)
Somehow I though the nVidia cards were way out in a league of their own on that, and 84GB is a lot less than 256 (or, soon, 512).
This is a two-year-old 5090 gaming GPU with extra RAM. The data center GPUs are much more powerful (with correspondingly higher prices).
84GB? How many child sacrifices does that cost?