Not to take credit from anyone else who helped save the passengers including his own life, but I think he's the real hero since everything depended on his one act of unlocking the door.
Why this is not automatized yet? The plane fell 5 Km in no time and nobody can add a line in the software to assure that the door unlocks automatically if the pilots try to crash the plane?
Hijacker in cabin shoots the inside of the plane to depressurize it. Pilot has to dive to rapidly equalize pressure. Door unlocks and the plane is hijacked at gunpoint.
This is but one of myriad scenarios. "Why not just X" ignores the amount of thought that has to go into security design on aircraft.
> ignores the amount of thought that has to go into security design on aircraft.
They clearly didn't have this case covered.
I assume that there are several pressure sensors inside of the plane, and that its value could be checked real quick by a computer just in case. Lack of pressure plus descending, confirm with both pilot and non cabin personnel, normal pressure plus descending and unresponsive pilot: unlock.
More likely they considered it and determined it to be a remote enough chance relative to a passenger being the hijacker that keeping the door locked was the better default. A LOT of things have to happen correctly (or incorrectly depending on perspective) for a fully trained pilot to decide to and successfully attack the other pilot and take down the aircraft.
Just one. This reminds me the old joke of the $100000 safe password device and the $5 wrench.
The inconvenient truth is that passengers are not the most dangerous people in a plane. Pilots are. They have in their hands the bigger weapon, and know how to drive it to a target. This is not the first time that a pilot goes rogue and locks the cabin, and we are exactly in the same point. Waiting for a stroke of good luck.
What has changed since the last time where they promised to review the protocols?.
If the people at charge can't imagine the possibility of a pilot being given the option of "you die, or you and your entire family dies", or forgot about the suicidal pilot a few years ago, then they really need to quit their jobs.
Not to take credit from anyone else who helped save the passengers including his own life, but I think he's the real hero since everything depended on his one act of unlocking the door.
Why this is not automatized yet? The plane fell 5 Km in no time and nobody can add a line in the software to assure that the door unlocks automatically if the pilots try to crash the plane?
Hijacker in cabin shoots the inside of the plane to depressurize it. Pilot has to dive to rapidly equalize pressure. Door unlocks and the plane is hijacked at gunpoint.
This is but one of myriad scenarios. "Why not just X" ignores the amount of thought that has to go into security design on aircraft.
> ignores the amount of thought that has to go into security design on aircraft.
They clearly didn't have this case covered.
I assume that there are several pressure sensors inside of the plane, and that its value could be checked real quick by a computer just in case. Lack of pressure plus descending, confirm with both pilot and non cabin personnel, normal pressure plus descending and unresponsive pilot: unlock.
> They clearly didn't have this case covered.
More likely they considered it and determined it to be a remote enough chance relative to a passenger being the hijacker that keeping the door locked was the better default. A LOT of things have to happen correctly (or incorrectly depending on perspective) for a fully trained pilot to decide to and successfully attack the other pilot and take down the aircraft.
> A LOT of things have to happen
Just one. This reminds me the old joke of the $100000 safe password device and the $5 wrench.
The inconvenient truth is that passengers are not the most dangerous people in a plane. Pilots are. They have in their hands the bigger weapon, and know how to drive it to a target. This is not the first time that a pilot goes rogue and locks the cabin, and we are exactly in the same point. Waiting for a stroke of good luck.
What has changed since the last time where they promised to review the protocols?.
If the people at charge can't imagine the possibility of a pilot being given the option of "you die, or you and your entire family dies", or forgot about the suicidal pilot a few years ago, then they really need to quit their jobs.
No subscription: https://archive.is/iOt5I#selection-573.0-573.86
[flagged]
What does that have to do with the article?
This story once again highlights that this is bad policy. At least this one didn't end like Germanwings or Malaysian.
No the story highlights that locking the door helps in most circumstances but as always theres always a but, and today we have the but.