2 points | by nephihaha 8 hours ago
3 comments
It should be obvious if current AI has been used to write any significant part on its own.
> The account claims to have analyzed several excerpts from the book using the AI-detector tool Pangram, which found the text was "100 per cent" AI.
And certainly nobody can blame them since Pangram advertises their service as near infallible
Related HN post about Pangram from a few months ago, particularly relevant to the "several excerpts" bit: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49023243
Most authors can be asked to quote passages from their work off the top of their head. If AI was used 100% there's a good chance they can't quote anything from the book. Would be an interesting test.
It should be obvious if current AI has been used to write any significant part on its own.
> The account claims to have analyzed several excerpts from the book using the AI-detector tool Pangram, which found the text was "100 per cent" AI.
And certainly nobody can blame them since Pangram advertises their service as near infallible
Related HN post about Pangram from a few months ago, particularly relevant to the "several excerpts" bit: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49023243
Most authors can be asked to quote passages from their work off the top of their head. If AI was used 100% there's a good chance they can't quote anything from the book. Would be an interesting test.