The thing about this is, that when a new technology truly succeeds the name fades away. The same will happen with .ai or .si if anyone takes that seriously.
We don't call HDTVs that anymore. We just call them TVs. Like what happened when Color TVs became the norm.
At some point a Self-Driving Car will just be a car.
At some point mentioning that a product includes AI will sound silly because it will just be a given.
At that point having ai inclusion be part of the products name will sound as outdated as saying Color TV.
If really a new expression need to be coined, that should be something that means derived Intelligence/type II Intelligence etc.
What is intelligence anyway?
It's just a weird attempt at cementing some legacy.
The rest of the world is not going to go along with it.
Then again, flattering thinking machines is not too bad, ... just in case :D
It may not even be as thought out as that. I think he’s simply trying to link his Presidency to AI in a way that lasts. So of AI does take over the world, which it won’t, it will be his legacy, of sorts.
But yeah, in the meantime it’s a humiliation ritual. Good.
For my sanity I don't follow US politics too closely, if "super intelligence" is truly being pushed hard then it seems reasonable to assume the reason why is to assert control of truth. Who are you to disagree with Super Intelligence when it tells you that Haitians are eating dogs?
I’m happy he’s dumb. If he were smart, he’d be way better at corruption. His lowbrow corruption of scam meme coins and fleecing tech CEOs for a couple million is pretty benign versus what an actually smart person could do.
No. His real innovation was shamelessness. A lot of high society functions on these "gentlemen agreements" where you can theoretically get away with murder but it'd be rather uncouth of you to do so. He doesn't care and it's led him very very far in life.
Yeah I wouldn’t be so happy about that. He’s that dumb because he was chosen for the dumbness and plausible deniability
There are much more incidious actors behind the scenes doing corruption at levels we can’t fathom whole Donald is the blunt force tool absorbing all the attention and negative press with his goofy corruption
I definitely can't use the word "benign" given the immense damage to our culture, economy, and national standing he's done, but directionally agreed. We're fortunate he's an actual stupid person.
> as his brain melts he's lost most of his touch, but Trump does have a natural bullies intuitive understanding of how to use this type of dynamic. the winning move is to tell him to fuck off but that's not a battle a lot of people will want to pick with the president.
To shrug it off is just another way to avoid the confrontation, to make it seem not worth one's time. If the people destroying our future are imbeciles, what does this say about us?
You're underselling decades of preparation from conservatives trying to lead to exactly this point. Pretending like it's just a Trump issue is incredibly myopic. Trump didn't write Project 2025 and he couldn't implement it alone. Furthermore, we have a significant portion of the voting public who fully support this. The fact that it's Trump's 3rd election and second win should tell you there's something deeply wrong with Republican voters. Trump is just the latest symptom of the sickness of this country.
Right. No one believes he's smart enough to have engineered any of this, he's just a corrupt buffoon who was in the right place at the right time with the right amount of reality TV fame to benefit from all you just said.
That's the only bright point about all this. Trump is kind of a 1000 year perfect storm of fame, corruption, and psychopathy; and he's fast approaching his expiration date.
I don't expect any of us will live long enough to see a similar skid-mark on the underwear of humanity.
> Furthermore, we have a significant portion of the voting public who fully support this.
Define "significant" - Trump has the worst approval rating of any president ever measured. The "conservative coalition" was always going to Balkanize, anyone with a modicum of sense could see that, and they were unpopular before but now they're EXTREMELY unpopular.
I mean, "a conservative win" in a country where 1/3 of people have no religious preference, 1/5 marriages is multi-racial and acceptance of legalized gay marriage is in the 70's. Winning a battle isn't winning the war, they were deluding themselves into thinking they were going to "reshape" anything.
Now they've outed themselves as nutcases, but crucially, nutcases who aren't delivering on the economic promises that were cover for their fascistic impulses, in a coalition that was obviously going to implode once they reached power.
Maybe looking back, this will be seen as the "dead cat bounce" of Conservatism than anything else.
The way I broadly think of it is that the left has won the culture and the right has won the economy. But not for the entire right, just the ultra rich.
Zooming out of the intradecade view, all the power they have won't ever put gay and trans people back in the closet any more than they can reverse interracial marriage. And all the social media outrage about billionaires will do nothing to reverse wealth inequality.
Social media outrage, no. But a state which doesn’t apply laws equally and consistently opens itself up to violence, a fraction of which will be directed at the billionaire class.
We only need to eat one, the rest will fall in line.
I don’t think the old “right is good for the economy” canard holds up today. It seems to be a holdover from disciplined fiscal conservatism in the 1980s; 40 trillion in debt, $6 gas, and a new and unpopular war are quickly eroding that talking point.
Just shows how effective conservative propaganda is. They are uniformly terrible for the economy and it is proven literally every time they have power. Even by the 80's conservatives were fucking over the economy. Nixon probably represents the most significant shift leading us to where we are today (See Nixonomics). That's late 60's and early 70's which "coincidentally" follows the realignment of parties after the Democratic party passed the Civil Rights Act.
You have to remember exactly how few people are represented by current US policies. They are willing to elect increasingly fringe candidates, "Just to feel something", in the hopes that something will change for them.
The keyword is `regime`. It’s smart if the goal is to run a political regime where you separate your friends and enemies and prove to your friends that you can make them jump when you say jump.
> For many outside the US, and undoubtedly some within it, the term SI is a source of embarrassment.
Speaking as one of those in the US, we have so much to be embarrassed about that the "super intelligence" thing barely registers on the scale.
I mean, yeah, it is stupid, but it is relatively quaint when compared to:
the stupidest war we've ever gotten ourselves into (high bar), the random murderous boat strikes, the immigration debacle and continued state-sanctioned murdering of both innocent immigrants and American citizens, the concentration camps (yes, we have concentration camps), the abandonment of the previous rules-based world order, the constant threatening of our own allies, the ongoing religification, loyalty purge and subsequent weakening of the US military, the quadrupling down on a fossil fuel economy in the face of very real climate change impacts globally, the very real and IMO likely possibility the current administration will attempt to nullify our upcoming election if it doesn't go their way, etc, etc.
A silly joke until being on the right side of it becomes a loyalty test, like election fraud, Trump’s intellect, height and weight, etc.
The point of something stupid like this is the power he gains by making you agree to say it.
It shocks me that people don’t understand who he is. Ignorant yes, vile, bigoted, cruel, illiterate, all those things. But he is not domain-generally stupid: he is a terrible genius at humiliation, at breaking people, at hollowing them out.
It may not be work, finally. But he is better at it than any other living person.
Political humiliation needs audiences. We're seeing that by being unable to stop hegseth from live streaming a firing squad execution of a criminal. We can't stop it, as Americans. That's humiliating and that's a loss of control.
So they're pulling out all the stops, this current American Administration, on the dictatorship show.
Is there more context anyone can give to help understand what’s going on: I read the post but curious if AGI is just morphing into SI in lingo? Why is it being politicized?
> The terminology used by the Federal Government should reflect the transformative capabilities of these technologies and the limitless opportunities they create for the American people. Accordingly, the term “Super Intelligence” more appropriately captures the promise, potential, and rapidly advancing capabilities of these technologies. It is therefore the policy of my Administration that, to the maximum extent permitted by law, the executive branch shall use the terms “Super Intelligence” and “SI” in place of “Artificial Intelligence” and “AI” and will not acknowledge the usage of “Artificial Intelligence” and “AI” in any applicable setting.
No, the directive is that all AI should now be called super intelligence (SI), and this stems from a single decision from the president rather than being an ongoing political debate. (AI was of course political before, but this terminology seems to have come out of nowhere.)
Why, I don't know. The OP's "purity test" theory is a possibility.
This is coming from the same person that didn't realize there was a b in dumb. The same person that likes to rename bodies of water. The same person that wants his name and/or his face on everything. It did not come out of nowhere unless nowhere is the void in the brain space of said same person.
A few weeks ago Donald Trump put a series of polls via Truth Social and Twitter with 3 choices for a replacement name for Artificial Intelligence (which according to him makes it sound like it's fake when it's actually real).
Then he removed "Supreme Intelligence" because he said it reminded people of the failing Supreme Court, and it was down to just "Superior" or "Extreme". [1]
Then, presumably after some industry people talked him into a compromise, he decided it was actually between "Superior" or "Super Intelligence", and the latter won. [2]
The US (without the imagined AI valuations) is in a full blown recession. The US treasury/administration is leveraging belief/investment in AI to keep the numbers up (oversimplified, but not by much). This means the administration has a vested interest in keeping AI churning and investment growing with no fallback except maybe the chaos of trying to start off a wartime economy? Because there are few recognizable AI players and the administration is not above extortion (choosing winners), they are leveraging the DOJ regulatory powers (witholding introducing barriers) to push a new grift. The situation is not strictly political, as much as it's a form of corruption.
The US's shit head in chief has unilaterally decided that it's no longer artificial intelligence but super intelligence. Now it's a game of waiting to see which of the lapdogs is the fastest one to obey.
I've noticed it has another benefit of giving the administration an out when they get hard questions about AI. They can huff and puff about calling it SI instead of answering the question.
The US has been falling so hard on its PR and propaganda department in the last, I don't know, 20 years?, that China actually seem to look like the good guys. People forget those extensive news reports, articles, stories and so on about the "chinese totalitarian dystopia" 15 to 25 years ago, now those seem like a joke in sight of what the US, and a great bunch of the anglo-germanic sphere, are doing.
But it isn't. He has a couple of tools he uses to measure loyalty of and to debase his followers. This is the former, it makes it very easy to see who is loyal and who is not. The tool to debase those that are loyal to him: he makes them repeat lies and accept increasingly morally decrepit things, kind of like how a pimp operates. We're currently on the "public executions" phase of that tool. These are not things that should be ignored and aren't simply the actions of a decaying mind.
> These are not things that should be ignored and aren't simply the actions of a decaying mind.
Even if they are "simply the actions of a decaying mind" they still should absolutely not be ignored. To the contrary, they should be paid close attention to, and appropriate actions should (but won't, sadly) be taken to rectify the situation.
I thought it was all going to blow over as just Trump yelling into the void as he does. Then I saw NIST updating all their docs to conform to this new naming standard as fed govt agencies don't have a choice but to follow the EO of the week. https://www.nist.gov/super-intelligence
Journalist Adam Cochran highlighted roughly 12,000 AI-related or pro-American political .si domains reportedly registered or transferred before Trump's public push for “SI.” Granted, their ultimate owner(s) remain unknown. The timing and volume is telling enough, given the wide variety of tlds.
When Jack Ma disappeared for months because he pissed off Xi, I thought this would never happen in the US. We aren't there yet but moving in that direction at a swift pace.
You must remember that the current top-of-the-top are fundamentally psychologically broken people. They started as emotionally stunted weirdos, got bullied for it, became more reclusive for it, built their mega-businesses with maniacal fixation, and now have huge sums of money to inflict their psychological traumas on the world.
they got rich by wanting to get rich and make money; that's the entire motivation and it doesn't have a ceiling.
you don't just get rich and stop, it doesn't stop for these people. They aren't rich enough. They aren't powerful enough.
Most folks at that table with Trump are way beyond the joy of creation; they're playing politics now, and their game is the competition with the 200 other hyper-elite for positional vying.
I don't have three commas but I got rich slow and then I stopped. I sometimes wonder what three commas would have been like, but then I see all these negative examples and I think I'd rather enjoy what I have than pursue more.
The way they suck up to Trump doesn't make them look powerful, it makes them look pathetically weak. I wonder if they feel like they are cleverly manipulating a moron.
I don't believe any of the CEOs currently sucking up to Trump so publicly respect him or think he is competent or smart. They are all smart enough to understand exactly just how stupid Trump is.
>"I really don't understand what the point of being so rich is if it doesn't let you tell a moron like Trump to fuck off."
Because they aren't really that rich. It's all a house of cards built on numbers in a spreadsheet, vague IP valuations, and server racks. The people controlling the true wealth are getting exactly what they want in the form of inflation on commodity and asset prices.
As someone from outside the US, I was surprised to find out impeachment does not mean removal from office, you need a senate supermajority and (to my even greater surprise) only 33% of senate is up for re-election at each election cycle.
So knowing this, I understand he might get impeached, but unlikely to be removed so I don't see a whole lot changing after midterms, sadly.
Yeah, it's a frustrating term. I remember as a kid wondering why there was so much drama about Clinton's impeachment when nothing appeared to have happened. It basically means "half the house agrees he should be removed from office". But then the next step is "two thirds of the senate also agrees", which has never happened among the four total cases of impeachment.
I guess it kind of makes sense - the percentage for conviction should probably be higher than the percentage for sending to trial. But it sure makes for a lot of fruitless drama.
Yeah he's probably unlikely to be removed from office, also in part because JD Vance would be worse (more competent, more actively malicious).
But that said, Dem control of the House and Senate can absolutely functionally hobble POTUS. He can (and should) be inundated with nonstop investigations, funding freezes, and so on.
This seems fine to me. The AI people all decided we have to talk about "Alignment" and "The Singularity" like members of some millenarianist cult, so turnabout is fair play: force them to adopt some incongruous jargon representing an out-group's worldview.
The thing about this is, that when a new technology truly succeeds the name fades away. The same will happen with .ai or .si if anyone takes that seriously.
We don't call HDTVs that anymore. We just call them TVs. Like what happened when Color TVs became the norm.
At some point a Self-Driving Car will just be a car.
At some point mentioning that a product includes AI will sound silly because it will just be a given.
At that point having ai inclusion be part of the products name will sound as outdated as saying Color TV.
It already does sound outdated.
or it becomes the name.
Kodak. Kleenex. PC. etc.
SI has no network effects. I reject it.
I am simply not purchasing a .si domain.
If really a new expression need to be coined, that should be something that means derived Intelligence/type II Intelligence etc. What is intelligence anyway?
It's just a weird attempt at cementing some legacy. The rest of the world is not going to go along with it.
Then again, flattering thinking machines is not too bad, ... just in case :D
“Don’t call it AI, call it ‘American Skynet System’”.
Chatgpt.ass
That's already in use for a subtitle format. I have many .ass files lying around.
It may not even be as thought out as that. I think he’s simply trying to link his Presidency to AI in a way that lasts. So of AI does take over the world, which it won’t, it will be his legacy, of sorts.
But yeah, in the meantime it’s a humiliation ritual. Good.
He wants "naming rights" and a way to pump the ccTLD for Slovenia, which he used to have connection to.
If you name it, you own it.
lmfao i didn't even think of the slovenia part.
Look at the price of .si domains the weeks before the announcement, gravy train ...
For my sanity I don't follow US politics too closely, if "super intelligence" is truly being pushed hard then it seems reasonable to assume the reason why is to assert control of truth. Who are you to disagree with Super Intelligence when it tells you that Haitians are eating dogs?
We just have an actual retard in the Oval Office, that's all. It's not much more than that.
I’m happy he’s dumb. If he were smart, he’d be way better at corruption. His lowbrow corruption of scam meme coins and fleecing tech CEOs for a couple million is pretty benign versus what an actually smart person could do.
No. His real innovation was shamelessness. A lot of high society functions on these "gentlemen agreements" where you can theoretically get away with murder but it'd be rather uncouth of you to do so. He doesn't care and it's led him very very far in life.
Yeah I wouldn’t be so happy about that. He’s that dumb because he was chosen for the dumbness and plausible deniability
There are much more incidious actors behind the scenes doing corruption at levels we can’t fathom whole Donald is the blunt force tool absorbing all the attention and negative press with his goofy corruption
I definitely can't use the word "benign" given the immense damage to our culture, economy, and national standing he's done, but directionally agreed. We're fortunate he's an actual stupid person.
Unfortunately, he's surrounded by intelligent people (Vought) who are somewhat adept at channeling his rage towards their own perverse goals.
it is quite the contrary, the smartest people are/would be the worst criminals … :)
> as his brain melts he's lost most of his touch, but Trump does have a natural bullies intuitive understanding of how to use this type of dynamic. the winning move is to tell him to fuck off but that's not a battle a lot of people will want to pick with the president.
To shrug it off is just another way to avoid the confrontation, to make it seem not worth one's time. If the people destroying our future are imbeciles, what does this say about us?
You're underselling decades of preparation from conservatives trying to lead to exactly this point. Pretending like it's just a Trump issue is incredibly myopic. Trump didn't write Project 2025 and he couldn't implement it alone. Furthermore, we have a significant portion of the voting public who fully support this. The fact that it's Trump's 3rd election and second win should tell you there's something deeply wrong with Republican voters. Trump is just the latest symptom of the sickness of this country.
No no, I think a lot is explainable by the dynamic you're describing. I just don't think this "superintelligence" schtick is one of them.
Right. No one believes he's smart enough to have engineered any of this, he's just a corrupt buffoon who was in the right place at the right time with the right amount of reality TV fame to benefit from all you just said.
That's the only bright point about all this. Trump is kind of a 1000 year perfect storm of fame, corruption, and psychopathy; and he's fast approaching his expiration date.
I don't expect any of us will live long enough to see a similar skid-mark on the underwear of humanity.
> Furthermore, we have a significant portion of the voting public who fully support this.
Define "significant" - Trump has the worst approval rating of any president ever measured. The "conservative coalition" was always going to Balkanize, anyone with a modicum of sense could see that, and they were unpopular before but now they're EXTREMELY unpopular.
I mean, "a conservative win" in a country where 1/3 of people have no religious preference, 1/5 marriages is multi-racial and acceptance of legalized gay marriage is in the 70's. Winning a battle isn't winning the war, they were deluding themselves into thinking they were going to "reshape" anything.
Now they've outed themselves as nutcases, but crucially, nutcases who aren't delivering on the economic promises that were cover for their fascistic impulses, in a coalition that was obviously going to implode once they reached power.
Maybe looking back, this will be seen as the "dead cat bounce" of Conservatism than anything else.
The way I broadly think of it is that the left has won the culture and the right has won the economy. But not for the entire right, just the ultra rich.
They won the power also
Zooming out of the intradecade view, all the power they have won't ever put gay and trans people back in the closet any more than they can reverse interracial marriage. And all the social media outrage about billionaires will do nothing to reverse wealth inequality.
Social media outrage, no. But a state which doesn’t apply laws equally and consistently opens itself up to violence, a fraction of which will be directed at the billionaire class.
We only need to eat one, the rest will fall in line.
I don’t think the old “right is good for the economy” canard holds up today. It seems to be a holdover from disciplined fiscal conservatism in the 1980s; 40 trillion in debt, $6 gas, and a new and unpopular war are quickly eroding that talking point.
Just shows how effective conservative propaganda is. They are uniformly terrible for the economy and it is proven literally every time they have power. Even by the 80's conservatives were fucking over the economy. Nixon probably represents the most significant shift leading us to where we are today (See Nixonomics). That's late 60's and early 70's which "coincidentally" follows the realignment of parties after the Democratic party passed the Civil Rights Act.
I hope you’re right but this is exactly what I thought about his first term. Yet, here we are.
You have to remember exactly how few people are represented by current US policies. They are willing to elect increasingly fringe candidates, "Just to feel something", in the hopes that something will change for them.
I might challenge the idea this is “smart politics”. Like I can get the tactics, but it feels disconnected from a greater strategy.
The best I can figure out is I guess good for the next two years having people subordinate to your administration.
The keyword is `regime`. It’s smart if the goal is to run a political regime where you separate your friends and enemies and prove to your friends that you can make them jump when you say jump.
For many outside the US, and undoubtedly some within it, the term SI is a source of embarrassment. But it’s good to know who bends the knee.
I read that as the US being the SI unit for embarrassment for a minute.
There's a joke here about the US adopting the SI system... but it would be sad whichever way the punchline lands.
> For many outside the US, and undoubtedly some within it, the term SI is a source of embarrassment.
Speaking as one of those in the US, we have so much to be embarrassed about that the "super intelligence" thing barely registers on the scale.
I mean, yeah, it is stupid, but it is relatively quaint when compared to:
the stupidest war we've ever gotten ourselves into (high bar), the random murderous boat strikes, the immigration debacle and continued state-sanctioned murdering of both innocent immigrants and American citizens, the concentration camps (yes, we have concentration camps), the abandonment of the previous rules-based world order, the constant threatening of our own allies, the ongoing religification, loyalty purge and subsequent weakening of the US military, the quadrupling down on a fossil fuel economy in the face of very real climate change impacts globally, the very real and IMO likely possibility the current administration will attempt to nullify our upcoming election if it doesn't go their way, etc, etc.
You forgot public executions!
A silly joke until being on the right side of it becomes a loyalty test, like election fraud, Trump’s intellect, height and weight, etc.
The point of something stupid like this is the power he gains by making you agree to say it.
It shocks me that people don’t understand who he is. Ignorant yes, vile, bigoted, cruel, illiterate, all those things. But he is not domain-generally stupid: he is a terrible genius at humiliation, at breaking people, at hollowing them out.
It may not be work, finally. But he is better at it than any other living person.
* working
[dead]
Humiliation is a key part of dictatorships.
- https://psyche.co/ideas/the-history-of-humiliation-points-to...
Political humiliation needs audiences. We're seeing that by being unable to stop hegseth from live streaming a firing squad execution of a criminal. We can't stop it, as Americans. That's humiliating and that's a loss of control.
So they're pulling out all the stops, this current American Administration, on the dictatorship show.
Is there more context anyone can give to help understand what’s going on: I read the post but curious if AGI is just morphing into SI in lingo? Why is it being politicized?
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/09/inau...
> The terminology used by the Federal Government should reflect the transformative capabilities of these technologies and the limitless opportunities they create for the American people. Accordingly, the term “Super Intelligence” more appropriately captures the promise, potential, and rapidly advancing capabilities of these technologies. It is therefore the policy of my Administration that, to the maximum extent permitted by law, the executive branch shall use the terms “Super Intelligence” and “SI” in place of “Artificial Intelligence” and “AI” and will not acknowledge the usage of “Artificial Intelligence” and “AI” in any applicable setting.
No, the directive is that all AI should now be called super intelligence (SI), and this stems from a single decision from the president rather than being an ongoing political debate. (AI was of course political before, but this terminology seems to have come out of nowhere.)
Why, I don't know. The OP's "purity test" theory is a possibility.
This is coming from the same person that didn't realize there was a b in dumb. The same person that likes to rename bodies of water. The same person that wants his name and/or his face on everything. It did not come out of nowhere unless nowhere is the void in the brain space of said same person.
A few weeks ago Donald Trump put a series of polls via Truth Social and Twitter with 3 choices for a replacement name for Artificial Intelligence (which according to him makes it sound like it's fake when it's actually real).
The initial choices were: "Supreme Intelligence", "Superior Intelligence", "Extreme Intelligence". [0]
Then he removed "Supreme Intelligence" because he said it reminded people of the failing Supreme Court, and it was down to just "Superior" or "Extreme". [1]
Then, presumably after some industry people talked him into a compromise, he decided it was actually between "Superior" or "Super Intelligence", and the latter won. [2]
[0] https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/2101350559328416142
[1] https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/2101698074166882517
[2] https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/2102067457506611585
Then he announced via Social Media that the White House considers anyone who uses the term “Artificial Intelligence” the enemy.
https://x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/2108230849347166360
nobody tried proposing silicon intelligence? seems a much less loaded and more appropriate term
Then he did an executive order officiating the renaming [1]. Now The White House considers people who still use the term "AI" as "THE ENEMY" [2]
[1] https://www.politico.com/news/2026/09/29/trump-signs-executi...
[2] https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/1174061766043...
> Why is it being politicized?
The US (without the imagined AI valuations) is in a full blown recession. The US treasury/administration is leveraging belief/investment in AI to keep the numbers up (oversimplified, but not by much). This means the administration has a vested interest in keeping AI churning and investment growing with no fallback except maybe the chaos of trying to start off a wartime economy? Because there are few recognizable AI players and the administration is not above extortion (choosing winners), they are leveraging the DOJ regulatory powers (witholding introducing barriers) to push a new grift. The situation is not strictly political, as much as it's a form of corruption.
You can't seriously, this far into Trump, be asking this question. It is a loyalty test and those that are loyal will get more rewards.
> those that are loyal will get more rewards
Seems remarkably hopeful within a lose lose culture.
Negative incentives seem more likely: punishment for disloyalty.
The loyal just get rugpulled.
Trump is doing another of his loyalty test stunts: give a ridiculous order, see who complies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hD5eqBDPMDg
The US's shit head in chief has unilaterally decided that it's no longer artificial intelligence but super intelligence. Now it's a game of waiting to see which of the lapdogs is the fastest one to obey.
Legacy framing feels off to me, the loyalty tests usually have a much shorter horizon than that, they're about who shows up this quarter.
And dont think OpenAI Marketing and PR thinks the same
I've noticed it has another benefit of giving the administration an out when they get hard questions about AI. They can huff and puff about calling it SI instead of answering the question.
The US has been falling so hard on its PR and propaganda department in the last, I don't know, 20 years?, that China actually seem to look like the good guys. People forget those extensive news reports, articles, stories and so on about the "chinese totalitarian dystopia" 15 to 25 years ago, now those seem like a joke in sight of what the US, and a great bunch of the anglo-germanic sphere, are doing.
I hate this "it sounds ridiculous and it is BUT it could just be 4D chess and here's why..."
Stop justifying this crap. It's just the drivel of a decaying mind.
But it isn't. He has a couple of tools he uses to measure loyalty of and to debase his followers. This is the former, it makes it very easy to see who is loyal and who is not. The tool to debase those that are loyal to him: he makes them repeat lies and accept increasingly morally decrepit things, kind of like how a pimp operates. We're currently on the "public executions" phase of that tool. These are not things that should be ignored and aren't simply the actions of a decaying mind.
> These are not things that should be ignored and aren't simply the actions of a decaying mind.
Even if they are "simply the actions of a decaying mind" they still should absolutely not be ignored. To the contrary, they should be paid close attention to, and appropriate actions should (but won't, sadly) be taken to rectify the situation.
I thought it was all going to blow over as just Trump yelling into the void as he does. Then I saw NIST updating all their docs to conform to this new naming standard as fed govt agencies don't have a choice but to follow the EO of the week. https://www.nist.gov/super-intelligence
Their name wasn't OpenAGI. They can be OpenAI who is a company working on super intelligence.
There is also the consipracy theory that MAGA people in Trump's inner orbit started buying up .si domain names in June.
Journalist Adam Cochran highlighted roughly 12,000 AI-related or pro-American political .si domains reportedly registered or transferred before Trump's public push for “SI.” Granted, their ultimate owner(s) remain unknown. The timing and volume is telling enough, given the wide variety of tlds.
At some point you have to start laughing maniacally at the spinelessness of America's top paper billionaires, or it gets very dark, very fast.
When Jack Ma disappeared for months because he pissed off Xi, I thought this would never happen in the US. We aren't there yet but moving in that direction at a swift pace.
I really don't understand what the point of being so rich is if it doesn't let you tell a moron like Trump to fuck off.
You must remember that the current top-of-the-top are fundamentally psychologically broken people. They started as emotionally stunted weirdos, got bullied for it, became more reclusive for it, built their mega-businesses with maniacal fixation, and now have huge sums of money to inflict their psychological traumas on the world.
they got rich by wanting to get rich and make money; that's the entire motivation and it doesn't have a ceiling.
you don't just get rich and stop, it doesn't stop for these people. They aren't rich enough. They aren't powerful enough.
Most folks at that table with Trump are way beyond the joy of creation; they're playing politics now, and their game is the competition with the 200 other hyper-elite for positional vying.
I don't have three commas but I got rich slow and then I stopped. I sometimes wonder what three commas would have been like, but then I see all these negative examples and I think I'd rather enjoy what I have than pursue more.
The way they suck up to Trump doesn't make them look powerful, it makes them look pathetically weak. I wonder if they feel like they are cleverly manipulating a moron.
Don't discount that these guys might be true believers.
It's a big cult and you ain't in it.
I don't believe any of the CEOs currently sucking up to Trump so publicly respect him or think he is competent or smart. They are all smart enough to understand exactly just how stupid Trump is.
>"I really don't understand what the point of being so rich is if it doesn't let you tell a moron like Trump to fuck off."
Because they aren't really that rich. It's all a house of cards built on numbers in a spreadsheet, vague IP valuations, and server racks. The people controlling the true wealth are getting exactly what they want in the form of inflation on commodity and asset prices.
[flagged]
As someone from outside the US, I was surprised to find out impeachment does not mean removal from office, you need a senate supermajority and (to my even greater surprise) only 33% of senate is up for re-election at each election cycle.
So knowing this, I understand he might get impeached, but unlikely to be removed so I don't see a whole lot changing after midterms, sadly.
Yeah, it's a frustrating term. I remember as a kid wondering why there was so much drama about Clinton's impeachment when nothing appeared to have happened. It basically means "half the house agrees he should be removed from office". But then the next step is "two thirds of the senate also agrees", which has never happened among the four total cases of impeachment.
I guess it kind of makes sense - the percentage for conviction should probably be higher than the percentage for sending to trial. But it sure makes for a lot of fruitless drama.
Yeah he's probably unlikely to be removed from office, also in part because JD Vance would be worse (more competent, more actively malicious).
But that said, Dem control of the House and Senate can absolutely functionally hobble POTUS. He can (and should) be inundated with nonstop investigations, funding freezes, and so on.
Quite a lot will change after the midterms.
buffon?
A misspelled "buffoon."
I believe that is an example of irony.
This seems fine to me. The AI people all decided we have to talk about "Alignment" and "The Singularity" like members of some millenarianist cult, so turnabout is fair play: force them to adopt some incongruous jargon representing an out-group's worldview.
Meta commentary warning.
WTF platform has to split that over three posts. I mean, at least it's not Twitter, but choose a platform that's fit for purpose.