My friend tried to investigate the AI second opinion space, and was quickly shut down when putting in a proposal to the FDA.
Apparently the net effect in patient outcomes because of a second opinion that isn’t verified/validated by a doctor was questionable enough for them to request clearer studies, proving the approach’s efficacy.
Please ask Claude for a “No thanks, delete my data” button on the checkout page…so I can click it.
Worth noting that on the consent page the user acknowledges that “My photos are deleted right after analysis”, and then the results page says “analysis complete” right next to a thumbnail of the photo. So, which is it?
My friend tried to investigate the AI second opinion space, and was quickly shut down when putting in a proposal to the FDA. Apparently the net effect in patient outcomes because of a second opinion that isn’t verified/validated by a doctor was questionable enough for them to request clearer studies, proving the approach’s efficacy.
$50?!
Please ask Claude for a “No thanks, delete my data” button on the checkout page…so I can click it.
Worth noting that on the consent page the user acknowledges that “My photos are deleted right after analysis”, and then the results page says “analysis complete” right next to a thumbnail of the photo. So, which is it?
So, what regulatory bodies did this have to get approved by before you could offer it?
Do you feel confident enough in the analysis to make a diagnosis sight unseen?
Number of apps collecting biometric data like voices or faces increases exponentially. What a time to be alive ...
Incredible money grab from exploiting vulnerable populations, this industry is so toxic
every other woman with money to burn gets bogged now. are they all 'vulnerable populations'?
People who are so self-conscious that they do elective procedures with risk of death or maiming certainly qualify as "vulnerable," yes.
I don't believe in generalizations if that's what you are asking me