> Neural networks can learn algorithms, not just patterns. The 777-parameter model didn’t memorize. It couldn’t. It discovered a general procedure for addition that works on numbers it had never seen.
If that's true, I would have expected accuracy to be 100%. Why isn't it 100% accurate?
> ...addition with 99.69% accuracy.
> Neural networks can learn algorithms, not just patterns. The 777-parameter model didn’t memorize. It couldn’t. It discovered a general procedure for addition that works on numbers it had never seen.
If that's true, I would have expected accuracy to be 100%. Why isn't it 100% accurate?
Are neural networks ever 100% accurate?
I'm glad it's not 737-Max-Parameter