It is almost like LLMs have gotten over their initial tells and now the tell is that they write these walls of text. This article reads just like the walls of text that my coworkers at one of my gigs paste all over the place. Any single sentence looks OK, but the overall wall has no flow. No cadence. No difference in tone between stating facts and drawing conclusions. Headers, lists, and charts thrown in for variety.
I'm not sure - maybe humans can write like this, too. But it is the written equivalent of a monotone voice, and I find it very difficult to keep enough attention to read such articles, regardless of their authorship.
Stop calling them labs, call them what they are, profit-seeking corporations focused on building products and capturing value in the marketplace.
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/Ap6E2aEFGiHWf5v5x/...
It is almost like LLMs have gotten over their initial tells and now the tell is that they write these walls of text. This article reads just like the walls of text that my coworkers at one of my gigs paste all over the place. Any single sentence looks OK, but the overall wall has no flow. No cadence. No difference in tone between stating facts and drawing conclusions. Headers, lists, and charts thrown in for variety.
I'm not sure - maybe humans can write like this, too. But it is the written equivalent of a monotone voice, and I find it very difficult to keep enough attention to read such articles, regardless of their authorship.