I didn't expect to read an article about a bull queer for donkey bussy today on HN but I definitely found it interesting
The fact that the bull tried to mount a separate donkey makes me think he's the one whose behavior / genetics / brain etc is more interesting, since being a willing recipient feels like it could just be a pecking order thing, like how sheep listen to dogs even though the dogs are a different species
I didn't expect to read an article about a bull queer for donkey bussy today on HN but I definitely found it interesting
The fact that the bull tried to mount a separate donkey makes me think he's the one whose behavior / genetics / brain etc is more interesting, since being a willing recipient feels like it could just be a pecking order thing, like how sheep listen to dogs even though the dogs are a different species
A Christian will say: them, not us.
A "Christian" will say: this article is fake, suppress it, punish the authors and publishers.
A liberal will be slightly intrigued before turning back to more important things.
A "liberal" will say: them, therefore us!
An expert will have questions: deep, sharp, numerous.
Five perspectives; only one is valid. Take your pick.
The Guardian article has a small video: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2026/nov/02/tender-bond-...
[dead]